Draghi versus the Germans - Who will win?

Ever since Mario Draghi announced the proposed ECB measures for quantitative easing (QE) in the Eurozone his plans have raised some serious hackles, most notably from Germany. Does the plan constitute an effective and prudent way to counter the risk of deflation that has been haunting the Euro-countries for quite a while now, or will it lead to the ECB taking on too much risk and end up being branded a Bad Bank?


The better part of a decade has past since the start of the global crisis, and the old continent is still in recovery mode. The latest hot potato is dealing with the continuing low inflation, causing low prices leading in turn to shrinking company profits and eventually, lay-offs.


Having exhausted its traditional instruments to no avail the ECB is now reaching for an unconditional weapon: quantitative easing. This method, in which the central bank buys government obligations in order to increase demand and push down market interest rates has already proven effective in stimulating economic growth in both the United States and Britain. There, similar measures have been credited as one of the major contributors to economic recovery.


 Unfortunately, Mario Draghi’s plan and most notably the reactions to it once again demonstrate how different the European Union is from its transatlantic competitor. Most notably the implementation of the bond buying process is under scrutiny. In the US this is simple: the Federal Reserve purchases US Treasury bonds. In the Eurozone, consisting of nineteen states each issuing their own bonds, things are not that simple. It is also here that the Germans have started to stir.


The main concern for the northern European nation is that the plan will lead to the ECB owning a large amount of high-risk bonds, namely those of the countries that have been on the verge of default for years now: Spain, Italy but first and foremost – Greece. Should one of these countries default on its obligations, this will have grave consequences for the European Central Bank, and (again) it will be the taxpayers of the highly rated Eurozone countries that pay the price. A concern not completely unreasonable considering the recent past, in which the Greek bailout programs have left Germans and other northern European nations feeling unfairly disadvantaged and which have resulted in widespread criticism of and even activism against ‘the European project’.


So what are the options for Draghi? Some critics argue that he can resolve the problems very easily, by structuring the plan in such a way that only high value bonds of ‘reliable’ nations are purchased. This however would seem incompatible with the ECB’s goal of providing economic relief to the indebted (southern European) countries.


Meanwhile, the clock keeps ticking. This week Draghi is expected to definitively announce the ECB’s plan, and it will be interesting to see whether the German concerns have been addressed.  If this is not the case, this could have serious implications for how the Germans see their place in the Union, and since Germany is the uncontested driving force behind the project, it would be wise to keep it happy. Draghi may very well attain ‘victory’ in this round, but as said in football: at the end, the Germans always win.


What do you, the risk professionals of the world, think? Is the ECB’s plan the necessary step to take or should other measures be considered? Is Germany right in its criticism? Let me know your opinion. Please feel free to leave a comment!

You need to be a member of Global Risk Community to add comments!

Join Global Risk Community

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –


  • As a German tax payer I am glad (in that instance) that there is (just once) some kind of Risk Management in the German Government. The problem all behind it is that countries like Greece or Cyprus have been allowed to join the Eurozone at all. It is one thing to tie countries like France, Austria, Spain, Italy, Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg … together, even though a few of them also struggle; but to include - because of greed and obvious delusions of grandeur - fault states into it, was not only from a Risk standpoint imprudent. The whole thing hits the fan because there is even not a bailout option for States, countries not compatible with the main countries conceptions or reversely the option to force those States out.

    So in my humble opinion - before thinking about building a bad bank out of the EZB and therefore put the citizens of the »Hardland Europe Euro States« in even more financial peril they - so the politicians - should all stick their heads together and come up with another framework.

  • It would be nice to think that the ECB operated like the Fed and that the EEC operated like the US. The problem is and will continue to be the lack of a federal states of Europe with a real central government. Without it, there can be no central market of "Euro-bonds" etc. that operates like the Treasury and other centrally sponsored government entities that can be centrally recognized and rated. Given this lack of unification, the markets will continue to focus their attention on the strong players in the Euro markets and continue to avoid the weaker partners, except where they see a way to make a quick "euro" on the purchase and sale of these weaker countries.  

  • I think that some form of ECB QE is necessary and inevitable but I also think that while there may be some form of announcement on the 22nd, nothing will be written in stone until after the Greek election on the 25th. Grexit is now being thought of in palatable terms (especially by the Germans) even though its fruition could become a slippery slope (Spain and Portugal). The European Union was a noble idea but in practice, more akin to herding cats.

This reply was deleted.

Introducing the Global Risk Series - Book 1 Risk Management How Tos

Dear GlobalRisk Community member, Our community’s mission is to foster business, networking and educational explorations among members. Learn from some of the top experts in the industry as they clearly explain how to approach the most important Risk management concepts. Check out their expert tips and use the link at the end of each article to navigate back to the website to leave your comment or ask a question.   Some of the topics include: How do you Explain Risk Appetite?  How to Prepare a…

Read more…
16 Replies · Reply by GlobalRiskCommunity Mar 21
Views: 984

[Free COVID-19 Framework] What's the path to recovery look like?

We created a free presentation (attached), which discusses both global and organizational impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, along with critical actions organizations should take immediately. This presentation introduces a framework that helps regions and organizations navigate a path to recovery via 9 potential scenarios. These scenarios capture outcomes related to GDP impact, public health response, and economic policies. The presentation also breaks down 6 immediate and critical actions…

Read more…
4 Replies · Reply by Steve Diaz Jul 8, 2023
Views: 222

If risk management is about decision making, are current risk management solutions irrelevant?

Now that the updated COSO and ISO risk management standards emphasize a connection to enterprise objectives and decision making, does this mean ERM and GRC solutions focused on risk registers and regulatory compliance are missing the true value of risk management?Will current risk management solutions evolve to integrate more decision support functionality or will standalone prescriptive analytics and other technology solutions take a more prominent role in enabling risk-informed…

Read more…
3 Replies
Views: 142

A question related to classification of instruments between trading and banking book.

We have an interesting question from one of our members.       "We usually perform OTC FX transactions with clients backed-to-back on the market (with Banks). Now we are going to perform a FX swap (i.e. Spot + forward) JPY/EUR for the Bank account for 1 week at the longest. The purpose is to get EUR place @ CB for LCR compliance purpose (no trading purposes). Bank's Management think that this should be considered as a trading position and therefore be classified within the Bank's trading book.…

Read more…
5 Replies · Reply by Prisha Singh Dec 26, 2023
Views: 349

Plunging oil prices: curse or blessing in disguise?

The recent sudden crash of oil prices has had a major impact on the world economy, leading to many troubled faces in the international arena. The Russians fear the effects of yet another powerful hit on their economy, Venezuela seems to be considering default and the Americans are weary of the consequences for its young and emerging shale oil industry. And then you have the Middle East, where the smallest match is enough to ignite the largest fire. But are these worries really justified or…

Read more…
1 Reply
Views: 102

    About Us

    The GlobalRisk Community is a thriving community of risk managers and associated service providers. Our purpose is to foster business, networking and educational explorations among members. Our goal is to be the worlds premier Risk forum and contribute to better understanding of the complex world of risk.

    Business Partners

    For companies wanting to create a greater visibility for their products and services among their prospects in the Risk market: Send your business partnership request by filling in the form here!