• Sep 9, 2015 from 12:00 to 13:00
  • Location: Online Event
  • Latest Activity: Oct 12, 2020

Overview: 

The majority of medical devices are cleared for marketing in the U.S. by the FDA under the 510(k) process. The FDA holds companies responsible for filing new 510(k)s when one change is major enough to impact safety / effectiveness, or when a series of lesser changes finally reach the "tipping point".

This is a major headache. How can companies make that determination? How can they trigger such an analysis over the major change or the series of smaller changes. What approaches are required for product changes; for process changes. How is the process risk-based? How to maximize the process against scarce resources. What are the different considerations for CE-marked product?

Areas Covered in the Session:

  • U.S. FDA device clearance / approval
  • FDA's and EU's emphasis
  • Product changes and filing a new 510(k) - who's responsible
  • Tracking and evaluating changes - the "tipping point"
  • Is the process "risk based"?
  • K-97-1 and the FDA's "Decision Tree"
  • Documenting the process / rationale
  • Resolving a "wrong decision" 

Compliance4All
Adam Fleaming
Phone: +1-800-447-9407
support@compliance4all.com
www.compliance4all.com

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Global Risk Community to add comments!

Join Global Risk Community

Upcoming Featured events

 

    About Us

    The GlobalRisk Community is a thriving community of risk managers and associated service providers. Our purpose is to foster business, networking and educational explorations among members. Our goal is to be the worlds premier Risk forum and contribute to better understanding of the complex world of risk.

    Business Partners

    For companies wanting to create a greater visibility for their products and services among their prospects in the Risk market: Send your business partnership request by filling in the form here!

lead