We are often asked for insight on business measures or KPIs for ERM programs to track overall progress and effectiveness. 

The key question for risk managers is: how do I measure the value ERM is delivering to my organization? 

The following are examples of measures that will quantify and measure the value your ERM program is providing:

1. Number of systemic risks identified

Systemic risk identification will detect areas of upstream and downstream dependencies throughout your organization, such as when one area of the organization is unknowingly causing strain on other areas.  Additionally, this method could also identify areas that would benefit from centralized controls so the extra work of maintaining separate activity level controls is eliminated, increasing organizational efficiency.
 
2. Percentage of process areas involved in risk assessments
ERM is cross-functional in nature and cannot be done in silos. A business is the sum of its parts. The same is true of risk. A risk event in one functional area also affects other functional areas within the business. Process owners own the risk; risk managers own the completeness, timeliness, and accuracy of the risk information.  The more process owners involved in risk assessments, the more accurate and forward-looking the information collected will be, both of which are hugely valuable to the organization.
 
3. Percentage of key risks mitigated
Having a sense of your overall risk coverage is important; however, it is not nearly as valuable as knowing the coverage of your organization's key risks.  Because all risk assessments should be conducted on standardized criteria, you can determine a uniform tolerance, or cut level, throughout the organization based on the resulting assessment indexes. This will help you to prioritize resources to the risks that need stronger coverage, rather than wasting resources on risks that will have no major impact on your organization. This gap analysis with a tolerance level will also help you to identify emerging risks as they rise out of tolerance and it becomes clear that some mitigation activities in place are no longer sufficient.
 
4. Percentage of key risks monitored
Most organizations have no understanding of how the business measures that they rely on daily are tied to their risks.  If a risk or activity changes, organizations have no way of knowing how, and if, these changes will affect their metrics. Through risk assessments and linking risks to activities, organizations can start prioritizing what activities need to be monitored.  Regular risk assessments enable organizations to detect increased threat levels and identify new emerging risks before they materialize and bring business metrics out of tolerance.
 

Download this eBook,  "Presenting ERM to the Board: Current and Future Trends," to learn how to measure risk management effectiveness.

Votes: 0
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Global Risk Community to add comments!

Join Global Risk Community

    About Us

    The GlobalRisk Community is a thriving community of risk managers and associated service providers. Our purpose is to foster business, networking and educational explorations among members. Our goal is to be the worlds premier Risk forum and contribute to better understanding of the complex world of risk.

    Business Partners

    For companies wanting to create a greater visibility for their products and services among their prospects in the Risk market: Send your business partnership request by filling in the form here!