Blog

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly becoming an integral part of both customer-facing and internal applications in organizations across the globe. However, with this growth comes the critical need for robust risk management strategies. In a recent conversation on GRC Chat, Aayush Choudhury, CEO of Strut Automation, shared invaluable insights into building dependable AI systems while safeguarding sensitive information. Here's a closer look at the key takeaways from this discussion and how companies can implement essential guardrails for AI security.

Surprising Split: Dependability vs. Data Protection in AI Applications

As organizations race to modernize their Governance Risk Compliance Frameworks, AI-driven GRC solutions are often hailed as the answer to longstanding inefficiencies. The promise is alluring: automate manual tasks, surface risks in real time, and deliver actionable insights at a pace no human team could match. Yet, beneath the surface, a critical split in the concept of dependability is emerging—one that too many overlook until it’s too late.

Dependability in AI applications, especially those underpinning risk management strategies, is not a single, unified concept. Instead, it divides into two distinct but equally vital halves. The first is the quality of the AI’s responses—can it provide meaningful, actionable recommendations that align with business needs? The second, often less discussed, is the responsible handling of sensitive data. Both are essential, but the industry’s focus has historically skewed toward the former, sometimes at the expense of the latter.

AI’s Allure: The Magic Fix for GRC?

AI-driven GRC solutions are frequently marketed as a magic fix for compliance headaches. Automation promises to eliminate tedious manual processes, while predictive analytics offer a new level of risk intelligence. Research shows that traditional GRC workflows are rapidly being replaced by AI-powered platforms, with cloud-based and API-first solutions setting new standards for scalability and integration. Automated evidence collection, risk scoring, and regulatory change monitoring are quickly becoming the norm.

However, as companies rush to make their AI sound smarter and more insightful, the conversation about data protection often lags behind. Teams pour resources into refining model outputs, tuning algorithms, and ensuring that AI-generated recommendations are relevant and actionable. Meanwhile, the question of whether these same systems are quietly exposing sensitive information—or are vulnerable to prompt injection and data leaks—remains an afterthought.

Lessons from the Field: Strut Automation’s Early Days

When Strut Automation launched its first AI-driven GRC solutions, the team quickly noticed a pattern among early clients. Most organizations were laser-focused on the promise of actionable insights. They wanted to know how AI could help them identify compliance gaps, predict emerging risks, and streamline reporting. Yet, almost none had considered the risk of data leaks or unintended information exposure until after deployment.

This oversight is not unique. Across the industry, there’s a tendency to treat data protection as a secondary concern—something to be patched up after the core functionality is in place. But as AI applications become more autonomous and take on increasingly sensitive functions, the cost of neglecting data safeguards grows exponentially. LLM prompt injection attacks, for example, can exploit poorly protected AI interfaces, leading to unauthorized data access or even regulatory violations.

Two Halves of Dependability: Actionable Insights and Data Trustworthiness

To build truly dependable AI-driven GRC solutions, organizations must recognize that reliability is a two-sided coin. On one side, the system must deliver responses that are accurate, relevant, and actionable. On the other, it must handle information with the utmost care—never exposing data it shouldn’t, and never using information in ways that violate trust or compliance requirements.

• Actionable Insights: The AI must interpret complex regulatory requirements, assess risk factors, and provide recommendations that compliance teams can use. This is where most of the industry’s energy has been focused to date.
• Responsible Data Handling: The system must ensure that sensitive data is never leaked, misused, or exposed through unintended channels. This includes defending against prompt injection, unauthorized access, and other emerging threats.

Studies indicate that as AI-driven GRC solutions become more embedded in business operations, the line between actionable insight and secure information handling is blurring. Automated integrations and real-time alerts are only as valuable as the trust users place in the system’s ability to protect their data. With spending on AI governance software projected to reach $15.8 billion by 2030, the stakes for getting both halves of dependability right have never been higher.

In the rush to modernize risk management strategies, organizations must resist the temptation to focus solely on the visible outputs of AI. Dependability, in the context of Governance Risk Compliance Frameworks, is as much about safeguarding information as it is about surfacing insights. The lesson from Strut Automation’s early clients is clear: true reliability demands equal attention to both sides of the equation.

The Unseen Enemy: Why Early-Stage Guardrails Matter

In the race to innovate, tech teams often prioritize rapid deployment of AI features, especially those powered by large language models (LLMs). But in this rush, a critical step is frequently overlooked: implementing robust access controls and data leak prevention measures from the very beginning. As organizations scale their AI capabilities, the importance of dependable AI in GRC automation and cybersecurity risk management has never been more pronounced.

Research shows that while regulatory compliance frameworks like ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, and the OWASP Top 10 for LLMs provide a solid blueprint for AI security, most startups and even mid-sized companies only consult these standards reactively—after a security incident or compliance failure. This reactive approach leaves organizations exposed to a host of threats that could have been mitigated with early-stage planning and automated compliance monitoring.

Why Guardrails Can’t Wait Until Production

The risks posed by AI-powered systems aren’t theoretical. Autonomous agents, now capable of initiating payments or approving invoices, introduce real-world consequences if not properly governed. Weak or absent guardrails can lead to unauthorized access to sensitive data, such as payment information or personally identifiable information (PII). These aren’t just IT headaches—they’re foundational design issues that impact business integrity and customer trust.

Strut Automation, operating in over 70 countries and backed by three funding rounds, has seen firsthand how early integration of GRC automation and access controls can make or break an AI deployment. Their experience underscores a simple truth: integrating security and compliance controls before hitting production is essential, not optional.

The Blueprint: Regulatory Compliance Frameworks for AI

Frameworks like ISO 42001 and the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (RMF) offer clear, actionable guidance for securing AI applications. The OWASP Top 10 for LLMs, a more recent addition, takes this a step further by mapping out the most common attack vectors—prompt injection, data leaks, and agent over-privileging. These frameworks aren’t just for compliance checklists; they’re practical tools for building resilient AI systems from day one.

• ISO 42001: Focuses on information security management for AI, emphasizing risk assessment and continuous improvement.
• NIST AI RMF: Provides a structured approach to identifying, assessing, and managing AI risks throughout the lifecycle.
• OWASP Top 10 for LLMs: Highlights real-world threats, including prompt engineering attacks and data leakage scenarios.

Despite their availability, studies indicate that most organizations delay adopting these frameworks until after a breach or compliance issue. This lag creates a dangerous window where attackers can exploit weak or missing guardrails, often with alarming ease.

Prompt Injection and Agent Manipulation: The Real Threats

One of the most insidious threats to AI-powered applications is prompt injection. Attackers can craft malicious prompts that trick an LLM into revealing confidential information or performing unauthorized actions. For example, a cleverly designed prompt might convince an LLM to approve a fake invoice or initiate a fraudulent payment. In autonomous agent scenarios, the stakes are even higher—these systems can now take direct actions with financial and legal implications.

Automated compliance monitoring and access controls are critical defenses against these threats. By continuously scanning for anomalies and enforcing strict permissions, organizations can block prompt engineering attacks before they escalate. Cloud-based and API-first GRC platforms now enable real-time alerts and automated evidence collection, reducing manual effort and improving response times.

Designing for Security: More Than an IT Issue

Integrating GRC automation and cybersecurity risk management into the design phase isn’t just about ticking regulatory boxes. It’s about embedding a culture of security and compliance into the DNA of every AI project. Early-stage guardrails—such as role-based access control, data leak prevention, and automated compliance checks—should be treated as core design elements, not afterthoughts.

The landscape is evolving rapidly. AI-powered GRC solutions are becoming essential for effective risk management and compliance automation. As spending on AI governance software accelerates, organizations that prioritize early-stage guardrails will be better positioned to navigate the complex world of regulatory compliance frameworks and emerging threats.

Ignoring these foundational steps until “go live” is a recipe for disaster. The unseen enemy isn’t just the attacker on the outside—it’s the overlooked vulnerability within the system, waiting to be exploited.

Small Changes, Big Impact: 3 Must-Do Steps for GRC Leaders Tomorrow

In today’s rapidly evolving risk landscape, Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) leaders are under mounting pressure to adapt. The rise of AI-powered automation, cloud-based GRC platforms, and continuous control monitoring has fundamentally changed how organizations must approach security and compliance. Yet, the most effective improvements often start with surprisingly simple steps. Drawing on lessons from Strut Automation and recent industry research, here are three essential actions GRC leaders should prioritize—starting tomorrow.

First, automatic flagging of sensitive data is no longer optional. Human error remains one of the most persistent vulnerabilities in any organization. Employees, whether through oversight or lack of awareness, can inadvertently expose personally identifiable information (PII), payment data, or other sensitive records. Relying solely on users to spot and report these risks is a recipe for missed threats and costly breaches. Instead, integrating AI-driven data leak prevention tools that automatically detect and flag sensitive data at the point of entry—whether in internal systems or customer-facing applications—provides a critical safety net. Research shows that continuous control monitoring, especially when powered by AI, significantly reduces the likelihood of data leaks and strengthens organizational resilience.

Second, as organizations increasingly deploy automated agents and AI-driven workflows, the risk of “privilege creep” becomes a hidden but serious threat. Traditional access controls were designed for static environments, where user roles and permissions changed infrequently. In contrast, today’s cloud-based GRC platforms and AI agents operate in dynamic, fast-moving contexts. If these agents are allowed to act beyond the privileges of the users who trigger them, the organization faces a new class of security risks—ones that can be exploited both intentionally and accidentally. It is essential to enforce strict access controls not just for users, but for the automated agents themselves. This means ensuring that agents never exceed the access rights of the initiating user, regardless of convenience or perceived efficiency. Studies indicate that managing AI agent actions with the same rigor as user access is vital for preventing privilege escalation and maintaining compliance integrity.

Third, adopting a recognized framework—such as ISO 42001, the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (RMF), or the EU AI Act—before launching new products or services is a strategic move that pays dividends. Too often, compliance frameworks are treated as afterthoughts, bolted on after development is complete or in response to regulatory pressure. This reactive approach can lead to costly remediation, legal exposure, and operational headaches. By embedding a framework from the outset, even small teams can stay organized, maintain clear documentation, and ensure that compliance is built into the product lifecycle. Proactive framework adoption supports continuous control monitoring, streamlines audits, and positions the organization to respond quickly to evolving regulatory requirements.

The broader context for these recommendations is clear: AI in risk scoring, automated evidence collection, and anomaly detection are rapidly becoming the norm. Cloud-based GRC platforms now offer real-time alerts, seamless integrations, and centralized portals that make compliance more accessible and collaborative. As spending on AI governance software accelerates, organizations that embrace these small but strategic changes will be better positioned to manage risk, ensure compliance, and drive business resilience.

Ultimately, dependable AI in GRC is not about grand gestures or massive overhauls. It’s about making incremental improvements that address the most pressing vulnerabilities—starting with how sensitive data is handled, how access is controlled, and how frameworks are adopted. These steps, while simple in concept, have a profound impact on reducing long-term risk and supporting sustainable growth. For GRC leaders, the path forward is clear: act decisively, leverage the latest technology, and make compliance a proactive, continuous process. The future of risk management depends on it.

TL;DR: The future of GRC lies in AI-powered dependability, but only if companies build solid guardrails from day one. Don’t treat trust and compliance as side dishes—make them the main course.

Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RXVE_FyZrTk
Libsyn: https://globalriskcommunity.libsyn.com/ai-risk-management-guardrails-you-must-implement-now-with-aayush-choudhury
Spotify: n/a
Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/nl/podcast/ai-risk-management-guardrails-you-must-implement-now/id1523098985?i=1000718781561