I recently wrote this article for TheConsultantLounge.  You can read the original article here:  http://theconsultantlounge.com/2015/04/top-business-frameworks-for-management-consultants/.

* * * *

Business frameworks and methodologies may be a concept foreign to many business professionals, but it is one near and dear to all management consultants.  As a management consultant, you will either have used many of these, or at least know what they are so you can nod in agreement when others talk about them! If you are thinking about a career in consulting, even before entering the field, all good consulting candidates will begin familiarizing themselves with basic business frameworks in preparation for consulting case interviews.

As the name suggests,  a “framework” provides a structured approach to analyzing and solving a common business problem.  It allows consultants to address a client’s business issue in an organized, thorough, and efficient manner.

There are hundreds of business frameworks available, and which ones you use will often depend on which firm you are working for and the needs of your clients. Listed below are commonly used frameworks in consulting, categorized into the areas of Industry Analysis & Market AnalysisCompany AnalysisProduct Strategy and Process Improvement.  

Industry and Market Analysis

Sometimes we are lucky enough to be assigned to a high-level strategy project, where evaluation of the competitive landscape of our client’s industry is a must. This process is often completed during the company’s strategic planning session or when launching a new product line or business unit. The frameworks are a sample of those which can be used to structure this process:    

Blue Ocean Strategy (BOS)

Sometimes called Value Innovation, Blue Ocean Strategy is a growth framework focused on the idea of creating an uncontested market space–i.e. a “blue ocean”. This framework is very innovative, as its principles challenge the conventional business strategy principles (defined by Porter, see below) of fighting competitors head-on. 

A powerful tool in BOS is the Value Curve, which depicts where incumbent players are placing their value.  It allows us to visualize where competition places value, where customers place value, and where there are potential opportunities to disrupt the market.  This then allows us to determine which specific value attributes to eliminate, reduce, raise, and create.  By creating new value attributes, we create a “blue ocean” to compete in.

Consolidation-Endgame Curve

The Consolidation-Endgame Curve framework is not a well-known framework, but is one that offers incredible insights into market dynamics and competitive strategies. In my opinion, it is one of the most insightful frameworks.  This framework was developed by AT Kearney after they performed a study on 25,000 firms, representing 98% of the global market cap.  The firm realized that all industries go through the same 4-stage lifecycle. 

By appropriately identifying a client’s stage and understanding the defining traits and behavior of the stage, we can better understand and predict market and competitive behavior and trends. Every major strategic and operational move should be evaluated with regard to the industry’s stage in the Consolidation Curve.  The industry stage also governs what type of management and leadership works best for the company.

Using the Consolidation Curve as guidance, we can strengthen consolidation strategies and facilitate merger integrations. A niche player can also determine the appropriate niche strategy to use and when the best time to be acquired is.

Porter’s Five Forces

A framework we have probably all used at some point, developed by Michael Porter (considered by some as the father of modern business strategy), Porter’s Five Forces is the most recognized and classic strategy framework.  This framework helps us understand the various dynamics among industry players and external “forces.”  It is based on the theory that competition in any industry is dependent on 5 basic forces—Potential Entrants, Internal Rivalry, Suppliers, Buyers, and Substitutes (or Complements).  The collective strength of these forces determines the ultimate profit potential and allocation in the industry.

Using this framework, we can determine how attractive it is to compete in any industry as well as what the overarching strategy should be to compete successfully in the industry.  Success is determined by the ability to develop a sustainable competitive advantage.  Five Forces Analysis can also be used to assess which industry trends may pose as opportunities or threats.

Company Analysis

There is a whole suite of frameworks focused on analyzing the client organization itself.  For the most part, these frameworks can also be used to analyze competitor organizations, and thus are often also used for purposes of market analysis.


Evaluates the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats of an organization.  It provides basic directions for structuring strategic analysis.  This is often done in conjunction with PEST (Political, Economic, Social, and Technological) analysis.

Value Chain

Developed by Michael Porter, the Value Chain framework helps us analyze specific activities through which an organization can create value and a competitive advantage.

Value Disciplines

There are 3 value disciplines to consider: Product Innovation, Cost Leadership, and Customer Intimacy.  Since a company’s resources are limited, this framework helps a company determine on what dimension it should compete.

BCG Growth-Share Matrix

This matrix can be used to identify the positioning of an organization’s portfolio of products.  Products located in each of the quadrants will be in fundamentally different cash flow positions and should therefore be managed differently.

GE-McKinsey Matrix

Similar to the BCG Matrix in intent, this framework also allows us to see the positioning of an organization’s portfolio–against the axes of Competitive Strength and Market Attractiveness.

Ansoff Matrix

This framework presents 4 possible product-market strategies, with each strategic positioning presenting its own growth options and strategies.

3 Cs

Also known as the Strategic Triangle, the 3 Cs framework offers a strategic look at a client’s  Customer, Competitors, and Company, with the thinking being that all 3 factors should be considered to form a successful strategy.


Benchmarking allows us to identify performance gaps (based on KPIs—Key Performance Indicators) compared to competitors in a similar industry.  Many consultancies provide their own benchmarking data for such analysis or purchase it from a variety of benchmarking organizations depending on the data required. 

Product Strategy

These frameworks deal with analyzing a particular product or service offering. These are often used when developing a product launch strategy for a client:

4 Ps

When evaluating a product strategy, consultants look at the marketing mix: Price, Product, Promotion, and Placement. This framework has been extended to 7 Ps (to also include Physical Evidence, People, and Process).  Pricing Strategy is often its own project with its own set of frameworks (e.g. Value-based Pricing).

Product Lifecycle

Product Lifecycle analysis is a tool to predict how sales will develop based on the age of the product category.  This analysis is used to predict sales growth, associated customer and competitor behaviors, and, in turn, devise the appropriate product marketing strategy.

Consumer Adoption Curve

The Consumer Adoption Curve is defined by 5 sequential stages.  By understanding what stage of the Consumer Adoption Curve a client is at, we can gain invaluable insights into who our target customer are, as well as their defining attributes.

Rogers’ Five Factors

This framework (named after Professor Everett Rogers), offers insight into the diffusion and adoption of product, as the rate of innovation diffusion is largely driven by 5 product-based factors: Relative Advantage, Compatibility, Complexity, Trial-ability, and Observability.

Process Improvement

There are numerous Lean Six Sigma (LSS) and Operational Excellence frameworks that can be leveraged for creating continuous process improvement, and many consulting firms also have their own in-house tools and templates used for process improvement.  Below is a very, very small sampling of such tools.

Balanced Scorecard (A strategic management system)

DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) and DMADV (Define, Measure, Analyze, Design, Verify)

SIPOC (Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, Customers)

Kaizen (Japanese word for “change for better”)

Gemba Walk (Japanese word for “the place where value is added”)

If you want to check out a few of these in more detail, you can download this free primer on the 12 core strategy frameworks. Of course, this article isn’t intended to be an exhaustive list of all possible frameworks (that would make for a much longer read!).  Rather, it is a review of some of the most commonly used ones.

What are your favorite frameworks? If there is a framework you like to use that you don’t see listed above, please share it in the comments section below and let us know what insights it offers and when you use it.

Votes: 0
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Global Risk Community to add comments!

Join Global Risk Community

    About Us

    The GlobalRisk Community is a thriving community of risk managers and associated service providers. Our purpose is to foster business, networking and educational explorations among members. Our goal is to be the worlds premier Risk forum and contribute to better understanding of the complex world of risk.

    Business Partners

    For companies wanting to create a greater visibility for their products and services among their prospects in the Risk market: Send your business partnership request by filling in the form here!