Maturity across the Counterparty Credit Risk (CCR) and Credit Valuation Adjustments (CVA) space varies greatly across the industry. Our recent survey provided some interesting insights as to whether banks are ready for CCR and CVA under Basel III, thanks to detailed responses from our clients and academic participants.

 

We found that there are clear differences of opinion between academics and practitioners particularly when it comes to Basel III readiness for CCR. The same is reflected with regards to banks having access to the right people and the right technology to effectively calculate and manage CVA.

 

However, from our survey responses, most banks themselves feel they do have access to the right people and talent but struggle with technology requirements, particularly with access to data. This is very much the crux of the issue facing the industry - CCR is a hybrid product and modelling it accurately requires several data sets which have not historically been combined for use regularly. Over 70% of the survey participants are now reviewing their credit support annex (CSA) and collateral agreement data in a bid to prepare for Basel III. Speaking from personal insight, further challenges will likely arise due to restrictions created by legacy systems, organisational alignment and computing power required.

 

Added sophistication, be it of process, technology or people, will come at a price, and there is a trade-off to be made between precision and cost of the overall architecture. This balance must be struck for the risk managers, quants and technologists who will use it and will be vastly different for each organisation.

 

Indeed, while most of the big names are well on their way to building their CCR management systems, several smaller banks are still trying to understand how far they need to go to be ready.

 

Clearly the stakes are high. They are further compounded by uncertainty around regulatory timelines, the extent to which the OTC market can move to a central clearing model and the capital charges and P&L volatility which CCR brings. Banks certainly need to start preparing now so they are not caught out further down the line. 

 

Votes: 0
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Global Risk Community to add comments!

Join Global Risk Community

Comments

  • Excellent and inspiring tips I like your post and it really gives an outstanding idea that is very helpful for all the people on web.
    It's glad to see good information being convey. Its a very nice written, and I really like this blog. Thank you for sharing this info.

    Regards: MCX, NCDEX

    MCX NCDEX Commodity Tips
    In this blog you will get MCX Tips, NCDEX Tips, Commodity Tips, Free Trial, MCX Commodity Tips, MCX Gold Silver Tips, Copper Updates, mcx intraday ti…
  • Really interesting read. For anyone who is interested, Euromoney Seminars are holding an event next week, Basel III: The Resolution, which will go into further detail about the effects of the new regulations. Please visit the website at www.euromoneyseminars.com/basel

  • This article is well written, to the point and accurate.  From counterparty risk functions for banks in Asia, what is stated here appears to be the general case and it is the small banks which appear to be struggling the most.

    Thank you for sharing this insight.

This reply was deleted.

    About Us

    The GlobalRisk Community is a thriving community of risk managers and associated service providers. Our purpose is to foster business, networking and educational explorations among members. Our goal is to be the worlds premier Risk forum and contribute to better understanding of the complex world of risk.

    Business Partners

    For companies wanting to create a greater visibility for their products and services among their prospects in the Risk market: Send your business partnership request by filling in the form here!

lead