13768233459?profile=RESIZE_710x

Application portfolios are bloated. Nobody denies it. But pruning them is harder than it looks. Stakeholders love their tools. Owners resist change. Costs are buried in cross-charges. The Gartner TIME framework changes the equation. It adds structure, speed, and accountability to what is otherwise an emotional, messy debate.

Built on 2 scoring dimensions—Business Value and Technical Fit—the TIME framework gives IT leaders a consulting-grade template to rationalize their portfolios with confidence. It splits every app into 4 buckets: Tolerate, Invest, Migrate, and Eliminate. No guesswork. No one-size-fits-all. Just clean, evidence-backed Decision making.

The TIME framework is not a dashboard. It is a decision framework that turns Inventory into Strategy. It creates alignment between Architecture, Finance, and Operations. Most importantly, it builds momentum in portfolios that are otherwise frozen by inertia.

Trend Watch: Vendor Bloat Gets Real

As SaaS sprawl grows, vendor portfolios are getting harder to manage. Departments sign up for tools, bypass Procurement, and 5 years later IT is paying for 5 versions of the same functionality. The TIME framework exposes this fast. By plotting apps on the TIME matrix, organizations can see which vendors are supplying high-value platforms—and which ones are quietly wasting money in the background.

The TIME Framework: 4 Ways to Act

  1. Tolerate – Stable, low-value apps you keep running lean
  2. Invest – High-value, high-performing apps you grow
  3. Migrate – Critical apps with technical flaws you modernize
  4. Eliminate – Low-value, outdated apps you shut down

13768234058?profile=RESIZE_710x

Source: https://flevy.com/browse/flevypro/gartner-time-framework-10156

Why TIME Cuts Through the Noise

Every organization claims to be strategic with tech. But ask a few questions—Which apps map to core KPIs? Which ones failed SLAs last quarter? Which tools cost more than they return? That is where the silence starts. The TIME model fills that gap.

By forcing teams to score each app based on agreed criteria, TIME framework builds a defensible portfolio view. Business Value looks at impact—Strategy alignment, Risk Management, adoption. Technical Fit looks at sustainability—uptime, security, integration, maintainability. Scoring is simple—1 to 5. Decisions get made on evidence, not anecdotes.

It also helps teams get real about tradeoffs. Not every underperforming app is a problem. Not every popular app is worth saving. The TIME model allows leaders to sequence moves instead of reacting. It converts clutter into a plan.

Let’s dive deeper into the Tolerate and Invest quadrants of the TIME model.

Tolerate

This is the quadrant most portfolios try to ignore. These apps are stable, clean, and add limited value. Think internal HR tools with niche use cases, or custom databases that work just fine but nobody wants to enhance. They survive because they do not break.

The TIME model does not try to force change here. Instead, it focuses on optimization. Feature freeze. License trimming. Infrastructure right-sizing. No enhancements unless required by law or security policy.

The key is to treat these apps like fixed-cost assets. Spend the bare minimum. Remove anything not being used. Run periodic reviews. The minute value drops or risk rises, shift them toward Eliminate.

Tolerate does not mean “safe.” It means “under watch.” And that subtle shift is what keeps portfolios healthy.

Invest

This is where Strategy becomes reality. These apps power mission-critical processes. They drive growth, support key metrics, and perform like a machine. These are the platforms that deserve serious attention.

But “Invest” is not about dumping money. It is about targeted growth. Focus on scalability, velocity, and quality. Invest means faster changes, stronger APIs, tighter governance, smarter Automation.

CIOs should treat these platforms like product lines. What are the bottlenecks? Where does delivery stall? Which areas are not meeting business demand? Use that to drive funding—not vendor promises or sunk cost.

And governance matters. Invest apps must meet higher standards. Clean architecture, sustained SLA compliance, no critical security findings. If they slip, they drop into Migrate. The bar stays high.

Case Study

A global retail chain adopted the TIME model to rationalize over 700 applications. After scoring, they found that just 14 percent of apps sat in the Invest quadrant—but those apps powered over 60 percent of their critical KPIs. The rest fell into Tolerate, Migrate, or Eliminate.

Instead of spreading budget evenly, they moved to a KPI-weighted investment model. Invest apps received double the funding for product, data, and Automation improvements. Tolerate apps were frozen and trimmed. Migrate items were moved to the cloud with tightly scoped modernization plans.

Eliminate apps—over 150 of them—were decommissioned in waves, freeing up millions in run costs. The TIME model did not just guide cleanup. It made investment strategic.

FAQs

How are Business Value scores defined?
Look at impact on Strategy, regulatory risk, user base size, and capability criticality. Use clear rating anchors, not gut feel.

What is a typical Tolerate app?
Think legacy reporting tools, internal time trackers, or outdated workflow apps that nobody loves but still run fine.

How does TIME handle vendor tools?
Score them like any other app. If the product shows low value or poor technical performance, flag it and start renegotiations.

What if app owners dispute the scores?
Use evidence. Scores are not subjective. If owners have better data, scores can be adjusted with documented rationale.

Do Invest apps stay Invest forever?
No. They need to earn that status quarter by quarter. Performance drops, cost spikes, or strategic irrelevance can trigger a shift.

Closing Thoughts

Gartner TIME framework is not just a model. It is a mentality shift. It says not all systems are sacred. Not all tech deserves a lifeline. And not every request gets funded.

For organizations chasing Digital Transformation and Cost Optimization in parallel, TIME model gives them the missing lever. It lets them do both. Rationalize with purpose. Invest with precision. Clean house with confidence.

The old way was to argue app by app. The new way is to let the matrix decide.

Interested in learning more about the other quadrants of the Gartner TIME framework? You can download an editable PowerPoint presentation on Gartner TIME framework here on the Flevy documents marketplace.

Do You Find Value in This Framework?

You can download in-depth presentations on this and hundreds of similar business frameworks from the FlevyPro LibraryFlevyPro is trusted and utilized by 1000s of management consultants and corporate executives.

For even more best practices available on Flevy, have a look at our top 100 lists:

Votes: 0
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Global Risk Community to add comments!

Join Global Risk Community

    About Us

    The GlobalRisk Community is a thriving community of risk managers and associated service providers. Our purpose is to foster business, networking and educational explorations among members. Our goal is to be the worlds premier Risk forum and contribute to better understanding of the complex world of risk.

    Business Partners

    For companies wanting to create a greater visibility for their products and services among their prospects in the Risk market: Send your business partnership request by filling in the form here!

lead